Some Notes on the Future of the Antarctic Treaty Collaboration
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9554283 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Edvard Hambro (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1974 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 217-226 |
| Publication date | 1974-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2199650 |
| OpenAlex | W2330520894 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 5 |
The Antarctic continent played no important part in international politics or international law before the present century,1 but scientific interest has been sustained for a much longer period. Shortly before and particularly during World War II, the strategic importance of the territory was recognized and the race to acquire new territory and to secure positions reached a new dimension of importance and urgency. The first important claim was made by Great Britain in 1908 and the last by Norway in 1939.2 Subsequent to that time several incidents have occurred, and many efforts have been made to find a reasonable solution for some of the problems of the Antarctic
Antarctic treaty · Dimension (graph theory · Geography · International law · Period (music · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Treaty · Arctic and Russian Policy Studies · Law · Philosophy · Polar Research and Ecology · Space exploration and regulation
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,04 |
| Citation span | 1975 - 1980 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |