The Doctrine of Res Judicata in Naturalization Cases in the United States

With nationality problems continuing to occupy a prominent place in both international and municipal practice, expressions of opinion of our highest tribunal upon the subject are received with peculiar interest. This is particularly true where the rule announced is one which governs the validity of naturalization judgments. In a recent sweeping naturalization decision which upholds the government’s views at every point, the United States Supreme Court has again stressed the rule that when doubt exists concerning a grant of citizenship, the statutes must be strictly construed in favor of the United States and against the alien. On October 22, 1928, the court handed down its opinion in the case of Anna Marie Maney, Petitioner, v. The United States of America, in which it affirmed, on writ of certiorari, the judgment of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The latter court had directed the cancellation of the applicant’s certificate of naturalization as having been “illegally procured” because of her failure to file, at the prescribed time and in the required manner, the certificate of her arrival in the United States

Alien · Certiorari · Citizenship · Doctrine · Equal Protection Clause · Naturalization · Original jurisdiction · Petitioner · Political science · Politics · Res judicata · Statute · Supreme court · Tribunal · Writ · International Law and Aviation · Law · Migration and Labor Dynamics · Migration, Refugees, and Integration

• Denaturalization on the Ground of Disloyalty

  Open Access•Lawrence Preuss•American Political Science Review•1942

  Add to list