De Facto and De Jure Recognition
The Arantzazu Mendi
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9560072 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Herbert W Briggs (Council of Science Editors, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1939 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 689-699 |
| Publication date | 1939-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2192880 |
| OpenAlex | W2335763888 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
The familiar and confusing distinction between de facto and de jure recognition is made even more confusing in a recent British decision, The Arantzazu Mendi . The failure to understand the distinction between de facto recognition of a new state or government and de jure recognition, has been in part caused by a careless use of terms. “The subject has been unduly complicated,” writes Borchard, “by the chameleonic uses of the term de facto , which has been applied promiscuously to de facto authorities in the field, to governments not established by constitutional methods, and as an adjective to qualify recognition. ...” Raestad notes that although “ de jure recognition ” is more or less equivalent to “recognition,” and a “dejure government” to “government,” the term de facto is used differently. What is the difference between (1) de facto recognition of a government, (2) recognition of a de facto government, and (3) recognition as a (or the) de facto government
De facto · Government (linguistics · Linguistics · Political science · Sociology · Basque language and culture studies · Law · Philosophy · Political Systems and Governance
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |