Responsibility of States,” at the Hague Codification Conference
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9560104 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Edwin M Borchard, Edwin Borchard (Yale University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1930 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 517-540 |
| Publication date | 1930-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2189683 |
| OpenAlex | W2312852874 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
Among the three subjects which the Committee of Experts for the Progressive Codification of International Law considered ripe for codification was the subject of “Responsibility of States for Damage Caused in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigners.” Acting on that assumption, the Committee sent out to the Governments at least three separate documents between 1925 and 1929: first, a Report of its Sub-committee, consisting of Messrs. Guerrero of Salvador, and Wang Chung Hui of China second, a Schedule of Points drawn up by the so-called Preparatory Committee of Experts, a smaller body, and designed to elicit replies from the different governments, presenting their views on different aspects of the general subject; and finally, the Bases of Discussion, consisting of the replies to the Schedule of Points made by some thirty governments, the substance of these replies being then crystallized into propositions called Bases of Discussion, on which The Hague Conference of the governments, called for March 13, 1930, was to conduct its deliberations. Perhaps that Conference was handicapped from the start by the fact that the Guerrero report, which had been circulated, departed materially, in some of its fundamental postulates and premises (representing minority views) from the subsequent Bases of Discussion, which reflected the views of the majority of the replying governments. Of the Latin-American nations, Chile was practically the only country to respond to the Schedule of Points on the Responsibility of States, and then only within the narrowest limits
China · Economics · Library science · Management · Political science · Schedule · Subject (documents · Computer Science · International Law and Human Rights · Law
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,08 |
| Citation span | 1976 - 2023 (48) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |