The Deliberative Process of the International Court of Justice
A Preliminary Critique and Some Possible Reforms
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9560107 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Richard B Lillich, Gillian E White (0000-0002-7584-7295, University of Virginia, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1976 |
| Volumen | 70 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 28-40 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1976-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2200561 |
| OpenAlex | W2327835961 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
The deliberative process by which the International Court of Justice (ICJ) reaches its decisions, although a matter of public record,1 is largely ignored today even by specialists.2 Several reasons account for this situation: the limited availability and somewhat opaque nature of the Court’s published procedures;3 the lack of practical interest in this aspect of the Court’s task;4 the reluctance of judges in the past to discuss, at least in print, any aspect of the Court’s decisionmaking process;5 and the impression held in some quarters that this process is something of a mystery.6 Consequently, few students of the Court have more than a hazy impression of how it makes its decisions.7
Economic Justice · Economics · International court · International law · Political science · Process (computing · Public international law · Task (project management · Computer Science · International Arbitration and Investment Law · International Law and Human Rights · Law · World Trade Organization Law
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,06 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1978 - 2019 (42) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |