Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Some Observations on the Calvo Clause

Bibliographic Data

ID9560336
AuthorsA H Feller (corresponding author)
Year1933
Volume27
Issue3
Pages461-468
Publication date1933-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2189974
OpenAlexW2334001508
LanguageEN
References cited1

In the case of the Mexican Union Railway, Ltd., decided in February, 1930, the British-Mexican Claims Commission, set up in accordance with the Convention of November 19,1926, added another stone to the somewhat unsteady structure of decisions on the Calvo Clause. The majority of the Commissioners enthusiastically adopted the considerationsof the United States-Mexican General Claims Commission in the North American Dredging Case, “ not thinking it necessary to repeat them, or possible to express them better.” Even the British Commissioner, Sir John Percival, who dissented, differed from the majority mainly in regard to the application of the opinion in the North American Dredging Case to the case at bar, and was not less cordial in his approval of that opinion

Commission · Convention · Dredging · Political science · Geology · History · International Arbitration and Investment Law · Law · Oceanography

  • Decisions of the Claims Commissions, United States and Mexico

    Open Access•Edwin M Borchard, Edwin Borchard•American Journal of International…•1926

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae