Limitations Upon the Judicial Function
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9561299 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Leo Gro (0000-0002-5337-4159, corresponding author), Leo Gross |
| Year | 1964 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 415-431 |
| Publication date | 1964-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2196219 |
| OpenAlex | W4243691396 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
The case of the Cameroons v. The United Kingdom concerning the Northern Cameroons, described, in a typical understatement, as “almost unique in the annals of international litigation,” has been terminated by a judgment of the International Court of Justice which appears as well to be “almost unique.” In fact, neither the Court nor any of the separate opinions referred to any precedent
Annals · Archaeology · Biology · Economic Justice · Function (biology · International court · International law · Political science · Public international law · European and International Law Studies · History · International Environmental Law and Policies · International Law and Human Rights · Law
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,08 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2014 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |