El Chamizal
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9561455 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Philip C Jessup (Council of Science Editors, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1973 |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 423-445 |
| Publication date | 1973-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2199140 |
| OpenAlex | W4241360585 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 6 |
Territorial disputes are commonplace in the history of international relations. The United States has had its share—the northeastern boundary with the British territories after the Revolutionary War, “54:40 or fight” in 1845–1846, the Alaskan boundary arbitration in 1903, and many others— including El Chamizal. This “thicket” or “brierpatch” was one in which the friendly relations between the United States and Mexico were entangled for almost a century. “The Chamizal conflict has not been a major factor in United States-Mexican relations, but has been a constant emotional irritant which has plagued both nations and had frequent reverberations throughout Latin America.”
Arbitration · Boundary (topology · Economic history · Geography · Latin Americans · Political science · State (computer science · History · Law · Philippine History and Culture
A Century of Disagreement
Treaties and Other International Acts of the United States of America
A Century of Disagreement. The Chamizal Conflict 1864-1964
The Chamizal Settlement, A View from El Paso
Treaties and Other International Acts of the United States of America
Dividing the Waters. A Century of Controversy between the United States and Mexico
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,07 |
| Citation span | 1982 - 1998 (17) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |