Anchugov & Gladkov v. Russia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9561585 |
|---|---|
| Authors | A Kh Abashidze, Аслан Абашидзе (0000-0003-0012-8795, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, corresponding author), Marianna V Ilyashevich (0000-0003-3363-6518, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia), Aleksandr M Solntsev (0000-0002-9804-8912, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 111 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 461-468 |
| Publication date | 2017-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/ajil.2017.31 |
| OpenAlex | W2750687356 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
On April 19, 2016, in The Case Concerning the Resolution of the Question of the Possibility to Execute in Accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 4 July 2013 in the Case of Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia in Connection with the Request of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation ( Anchugov & Gladkov (Russ.)), the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (Constitutional Court) held that decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) are binding on Russian courts, in accordance with Article 15(4) of the 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation. At the same time, the Constitutional Court stressed the necessity of ensuring a reasonable balance between the obligation to implement ECtHR judgments and respect for the fundamental principles of the Russian Federation's constitutional system. The Constitutional Court found that because the ECtHR judgment in question implicitly conflicted with provisions of the Russian Constitution, Russian courts are not obliged to comply with the judgment regarding issues that remain in conflict; however, other means are available to the Russian legislature to give effect to the judgment. While the decision marks an important development in Russia's relationship with the European system of human rights, it is not inconsistent with the approach taken by a substantial number of European domestic courts in holding that treaty obligations to enforce decisions of international courts cannot justify violating domestic constitutional norms
Constitution · Constitutional court · Human rights · Legislature · Obligation · Political science · Russian federation · Sociology · Treaty · European and International Law Studies · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Policy Issues
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |