Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Are Disabled Readers Delayed or Different? An Approach Using an Objective Miscue Analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID9614918
AuthorsYVE WILLICH (La Trobe University), Margot Prior (La Trobe University), Geoff Cummings (0000-0003-1716-5277, La Trobe University), GEOFF CUMMING, TOM SPANOS (La Trobe University)
Year1988
Volume58
Issue3
Pages315-329
Publication date1988-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Educational Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0998 • E-ISSN: 2044-8279
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00907.x
PMID3233188
OpenAlexW2079383683
LanguageEN

S ummary . The question of whether the reading behaviour of disabled readers is qualitatively different from that of normally reading children has as yet received no clearcut answer. An objectively scored and simplified version of the Goodman miscue analysis system was developed as a means of comparing the use of various reading cues by Grade 4 disabled readers and Grade 2 normal readers whose reading level was psychometrically equivalent. The disabled readers were not only delayed but also qualitatively different from controls in that they made significantly less use of syntactic, semantic and text meaning cues. They also differed in self‐correction behaviour with the disabled readers tolerating much more nonsense in their oral reading

Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Linguistics · Meaning (existential) · Miscue analysis · Nonsense · Psychotherapist · Reading (process) · Reading comprehension · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae