Teaching writing to ESL graduate students
A model and an illustration
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9615413 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Biggs (0000-0003-4188-9064, UNSW Sydney), Patrick Lai, Yau Ming Lai (0000-0002-5051-5737, Hong Kong Polytechnic University), Catherine So-Kum Tang (0000-0002-7577-4372, Education University of Hong Kong, corresponding author), Catherine Tang (0000-0001-5763-5726), Ellen Lavelle (University of South Dakota) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 293-306 |
| Publication date | 1999-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Educational Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-0998 • E-ISSN: 2044-8279 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1348/000709999157725 |
| OpenAlex | W2063785147 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Background. Graduate students, especially those writing in a second language, have specific writing needs. Previous research suggests that intervention might be more didactic than writing instruction frequently is. Aims. 1. To adapt a knowledge x levels x process model of writing (Biggs & Moore, 1993) to conceptualise the writing needs of graduate students. Students need to know certain rhetorical knowledge, and to apply cognitive space‐saving strategies at the appropriate place and level of ideation during writing. The model integrates the didactic and eclectic elements of Torrance, Thomas & Robinson's (1993) interventions with graduate students’ writing. 2. To develop and trial a workshop based on the model, addressing the writing needs of graduate students to whom English is a second language. Samples. Eighteen students from science‐related disciplines, and 16 from nonscience, participated in the workshop. All were enrolled in research higher degrees in a Hong Kong university where English is the required medium for the dissertation. Method. The workshops ran for 2 1/2 days each, focusing on dissertation writing, and writing for an academic journal. Before/after measures were taken on the Inventory of Processes in College Composition (IPIC) (Lavelle, 1993), and students completed an open‐ended questionnaire at the end of the workshop. Results. Three IPIC scales showed significant pre‐/post‐change: lower procedural and spontaneous/impulsive scores (surface‐related), higher elaborationist (deep‐related). Open‐ended feedback supported the view that
Academic writing · Cognition · Composition (language) · Graduate students · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Professional writing · Rhetorical question · Second language · Second language writing · Writing process · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Psychology · Writing and Handwriting Education
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,09 |
| Citation span | 2004 - 2006 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |