Does ‘denial’ really cover our everyday experiences in clinical oncology? A critical view from a psychoanalytic perspective on the use of ‘denial’
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9618152 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Par Salander (0000-0001-9998-2574, Umeå University, corresponding author), Gunnar Windahl |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 267-279 |
| Publication date | 1999-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Medical Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1129 • E-ISSN: 2056-5194 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1348/000711299159899 |
| PMID | 10397430 |
| OpenAlex | W2065010316 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
The concept of ‘denial’ emanates from psychoanalytic psychology. Within this framework it is regarded as a primitive defence mechanism related to personality disorder. The concept has been adopted by coping research but invested with quite other implications. Different researchers operationalize ‘ denial’ in different ways which contributes to this confusion. This paper views ‘denial’ from the different perspectives of psychoanalysis and coping research and, based on a previous qualitative study, it proposes a reconceptualization which distinguishes between three different processes: ‘avoidance’, ‘disavowal’ and ‘denial’. ‘Disavowal’, self‐deception in the face of accurate perception, is, more than ‘denial’, regarded as the appropriate concept covering everyday experiences of patients dealing mentally with their strain
Confusion · Coping (psychology) · Denial · Epistemology · Operationalization · Personality · Perspective (graphical) · Psychoanalysis · Psychoanalytic theory · Psychotherapist · Trustworthiness · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Personality Disorders and Psychopathology · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.09 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2004 - 2023 (20) |
| Highly cited | No |