Working Backward and Working Forward in Problem‐solving
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9619586 |
|---|---|
| Authors | W S Anthony (University of Hull, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1966 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 53-59 |
| Publication date | 1966-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1966.tb01003.x |
| PMID | 5938974 |
| OpenAlex | W2026922625 |
| Language | EN |
N.E. Miller (1959) and others have stressed the effectiveness and creativity of working backward in problem‐solving; but Newell, Shaw, & Simon (1962) argued that working backward is not inherently superior to working forward. An experiment is reported in which undergraduate subjects were set a series of route‐finding tasks in a maze‐situation modified to allow observation of working forward and working backward. The effectiveness of the two directions of work was controlled. The method and results of the experiment are discussed in relation to the views of the above‐named writers and others
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Creativity · Relation (database) · Set (abstract data type) · Working memory · Computer Science · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |