Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Predominant and non‐predominant analysis

Effects of level of presentation

Bibliographic Data

ID9620158
AuthorsJohn A Groeger (0000-0002-3582-1058, corresponding author)
Year1986
Volume77
Issue1
Pages109-116
Publication date1986-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb01986.x
OpenAlexW2000173469
LanguageEN

Evidence is presented which supports earlier findings by the author which suggested that stimuli outside our awareness receive a predominantly semantic analysis whereas stimuli which we realize are present, but do not recognize, are processed in a predominantly structural fashion. The work reported here extends such findings to another sense mode. i.e. hearing, and employs a very different task, i.e. sentence completion. The research presented shows that non‐predominant analyses, if carried out at all, do not influence the outcomes of predominant processing. This is taken to suggest that the type of analysis automatically carried out on stimuli depends on the level at which they are received and requires a complex, non‐linear view of the perceptual process

Audiology · Cognitive psychology · Natural language processing · Perception · Presentation (obstetrics) · Sentence · Task (project management) · Computer Science · Multisensory perception and integration · Neuroscience · Psychology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae