Individual differences in the evolution of causal illusions
Bibliographic Data
In this research, we investigated individual differences in the formation and persistence of causal illusions. In a re‐analysis of existing data, we identified two clusters of participants – persistent and adjusting – based on their trajectories in learning from repeated exposure to null contingencies. The persistent cluster maintained stable causal illusions, while the adjusting cluster demonstrated a reduction over time. This re‐analysis provided a nuanced understanding of individual differences in causal learning, emphasizing the differential role of probability estimations in predicting causal judgements. These findings were replicated in a subsequent study, highlighting the robustness of the identified effects. In a pre‐registered study, we extended the paradigm to include a second phase (active phase) to assess how individual differences in causal illusion trajectories in the passive phase would manifest when participants had agency in the information gathering process. The results were consistent with those of the two previous studies and confirmed our primary hypothesis that the adjusting cluster would exhibit a lower tendency to introduce the candidate cause on learning trials, and would, therefore, observe a higher frequency of cause–absent trials. Together, these studies provide comprehensive insights into the underpinnings of causal illusion development and persistence, potentially informing de‐biasing interventions
Causal inference · Cluster (spacecraft) · Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Econometrics · Illusion · Persistence (discontinuity) · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Pain Management and Placebo Effect · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs · Psychology
Emmeans
Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students
Instruction on the Scientific Method Provides (Some) Protection Against Illusions of Causality
A debiasing intervention to reduce the causality bias in undergraduates
Causal illusion as a cognitive basis of pseudoscientific beliefs
Illusions of causality at the heart of pseudoscience
Superstition predicts perception of illusory control
Human contingency judgments
| Highly cited | No |
|---|