Evidence for executive deficits among users of MDMA (Ecstasy)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9620257 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John E Fisk (0000-0002-2981-0870, Liverpool John Moores University, corresponding author), Catharine Montgomery (0000-0003-2805-5807, Liverpool John Moores University), Philip Murphy (0009-0004-0192-8078), Philip N Murphy (0000-0001-7478-2170, Edge Hill University), Michelle Wareing (Edge Hill University) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 95 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 457-466 |
| Publication date | 2004-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1348/0007126042369785 |
| PMID | 15527532 |
| OpenAlex | W2049360930 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
Random letter generation and computation span are tasks known to load on executive, prefrontal resources. Previous research suggests that Ecstasy users are impaired on random letter generation. The current study, employing a larger sample (44 current Ecstasy users, and 59 non‐Ecstasy users), together with more effective statistical controls for other drug use, failed to replicate previous findings. Ecstasy users were unimpaired on all measures of random generation performance. A significant difference was obtained on the computation span measure, with Ecstasy users scoring significantly lower than non‐Ecstasy users. This difference remained statistically significant following control for various indicators of the use of other drugs including cannabis. The results are discussed in terms of the potential effects that Ecstasy might have on different component executive processes
Cannabis · Cognition · Developmental psychology · Ecstasy · MDMA · Psychiatry · Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis · Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior · Psychedelics and Drug Studies · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2014 - 2014 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |