Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Effects of study‐test modality on false recognition

Bibliographic Data

ID9620317
AuthorsElizabeth A Maylor (0000-0001-6351-3434, University of Warwick, corresponding author), Andrew Mo (University of Warwick)
Year1999
Volume90
Issue4
Pages477-493
Publication date1999-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1348/000712699161567
OpenAlexW2015934493
LanguageEN
Citations received4

Many recent investigations of false memories have generally followed Roediger & McDermott (1995) in using auditory presentation at study and a visual recognition test; the results reveal high rates of false alarms to non‐studied lure words that are associatively related to studied words. We presented lists of words related to critical lure words either auditorially (A) or visually (V); recognition was tested either auditorially or visually, producing four study‐test conditions (AA, AV, VA, and VV). The false recognition rate for critical lures was higher following visual presentation (.76) than following auditory presentation (.35). Moreover, false recognition rates were higher when study and test modalities differed than when they matched (AV higher than AA; VA higher than VV). Correct recognition rate was actually exceeded by false recognition rate following visual presentation, whereas the reverse was the case following auditory presentation. For each word recognized as old (whether correctly or falsely), a remember know guess judgment was required. The proportion of words that were consciously recollected (i.e. remembered) was not significantly lower for false recognitions than for correct recognitions in any of the four conditions. It is concluded that false recognition can be reduced by factors that enhance correct recognition (auditory rather than visual presentation at study; same rather than different modality at study and at test), but when false recognition occurs, the subjective experience of remembering may be indistinguishable from correct recognition, regardless of study‐test modality

Audiology · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · False Memory · Linguistics · Modality (human–computer interaction) · Presentation (obstetrics) · Reading (process) · Recall · Recognition memory · Speech recognition · Test (biology) · Word recognition · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Memory Processes and Influences · Neuroscience · Psychology

  • What research paradigms have cognitive psychologists used to study “False memory,” and what are the implications of these choices

    Open Access•Kathy Pezdek, Shirley Lam et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2007

  • The Science of False Memory

    C J RAINERD, Charles J Brainerd et al.•SCIENCE OF FALSE MEMORY.•2005

  • Criando Falsas Memórias em Adultos por meio de Palavras Associadas

    Open Access•Lilian Milnitsky Stein, Giovanni Kuckartz Pergher•Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica•2001

  • Modality Effect of Cross-Language False Memory among-Less Proficient Chinese-English Bilinguals

    Weibin Mao, Wei-Bin MAO•Acta Psychologica Sinica•2008

Citations per year0.16
Citation span2001 - 2008 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae