Sex differences in imagery vividness
An artifact of the test
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9620553 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Roderick Ashton (The University of Queensland, corresponding author), Kenneth White (0000-0002-6103-9078, The University of Queensland), Kenneth D White |
| Year | 1980 |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 35-38 |
| Publication date | 1980-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1980.tb02726.x |
| OpenAlex | W1984258878 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
When scores from a modified Sheehan/Betts imagery questionnaire were reanalysed, previous findings ‐ that females report more vivid imagery than males ‐ were not confirmed. Because the modification affected only response bias, through changes in questionnaire format, it is argued that previously reported sex differences may be artifactual in so far as imagery vividness scores are concerned
Artifact (error) · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Mental image · Psychiatry · Test (biology) · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Ocular and Laser Science Research · Psychology · Radiology practices and education
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
| Citation span | 1989 - 2012 (24) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |