Defending the Liberal Revolution in France
Provincial Reactions to the Parisian journée of 20 June 1792
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9634331 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William S Cormack (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 233-253 |
| Publication date | 2018-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-4107 • E-ISSN: 2292-8502 |
| Publisher | University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3138/cjh.ach.53.2.02 |
| OpenAlex | W2884038941 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 7 |
On 20 June 1792 popular militants from the Paris Sections marched in arms to the Legislative Assembly where they demanded that the deputies constrain or remove the king. The crowds then invaded the Tuileries palace to intimidate Louis XVI directly. While forced to don the red cap of the Sans-Culottes, the king made no concessions to the demonstrators. Historians of the French Revolution have interpreted this episode as a step toward the insurrection of 10 August 1792 which overthrew the monarchy. While acknowledging that the journée of 20 June provoked protests throughout France, both Marxists and revisionists have construed these as expressions of royalism and minimized their importance. Yet the provincial reactions provide evidence of a more subtle division in the country as the revolution shifted to a more radical phase. This article examines the petitions and addresses that were sent from the departments to the Legislative Assembly to protest the events of 20 June 1792 in Paris. While these texts denounced the outrages committed against the king, they went beyond manifestations of loyalty to express commitment to the ideal of constitutionalism. Some addresses reflected local conflict between administrators and popular revolutionaries. Not all protests against the events in Paris were sent by wealthy bourgeoisie, however, and the petitions provide evidence of a political and ideological division beyond class conflict. The provincial reactions to 20 June 1792 suggest that many in France still hoped to defend the liberal revolution with its promise of individual liberty, property rights, and the rule of law, and to identify national sovereignty with the decisions of an elected legislature under a constitution rather than direct manifestations of popular will, on the eve of a second revolution, which would sweep away the Constitution of 1791
Bourgeoisie · Constitutional monarchy · Constitutionalism · Democracy · Economic history · Ideal (ethics) · Ideology · Legislature · Monarchy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · European Political History Analysis · French Historical and Cultural Studies · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · Law
| Citations per year | 0.18 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2015 - 2019 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |