The Perversion of Nature
Johannes Baptista Van Helmont, the Society of Jesus, and the Magnetic Cure of Wounds
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9636932 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark A Waddell (0000-0001-9978-1297, John Hopkins University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 179-198 |
| Publication date | 2003-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-4107 • E-ISSN: 2292-8502 |
| Publisher | University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3138/cjh.38.2.179 |
| OpenAlex | W129632838 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
One of the seventeenth century’s most prominent medical reformers, Johannes Baptista van Helmont (1579-1644) was also one of the most controversial figures of his time, thanks to the widespread public censure inspired by his 1621 treatise on the magnetic cure of wounds. Van Helmont defended his work by claiming that it had been illicitly published, without his permission, by a member of the Society of Jesus, Jean Roberti (1569-1651). This paper will attempt to place Van Helmont’s accusation against Roberti within the wider intellectual and cultural context of the period, which saw the definition of nature become increasingly more fluid and open to a variety of novel interpretations. Since its inception, the Society of Jesus had embraced a variant of the long-lived Scholastic philosophy as its primary focus in both natural philosophy and pedagogy. At the same time, a widespread movement against Scholasticism prompted the creation of entirely new philosophies of nature. Van Helmont’s work on the magnetic cure of wounds advanced a philosophical system at odds with the Scholastic physics codified in the institutional and pedagogical practices of the Society, and simultaneously challenged the Society’s right to participate in the natural philosophical culture of the time. Though direct proof for Roberti’s illicit publication of Van Helmont’s work is lacking, an examination of the rich context surrounding this particular encounter can better explain Van Helmont’s accusation of interference levelled against a member of the Society
Context (archaeology) · Denunciation · False accusation · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Historical Philosophy and Science · History · History of Medicine Studies · Law · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
Magnetism for Librarians. Leone Allacci’s De Magnete (1625) and its Relation to Giulio Cesare LaGalla’s Disputatio de Sympathia et Antipathia (1623)
Virus. Beiträge zur Sozialgeschichte der Medizin Band 07
A Century of Miracles. Miracles of Jesuit Saints in Bohemia 1620–1720
The Noctambuli
Romancing the salve
| Citations per year | 0.28 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2008 - 2022 (15) |
| Highly cited | No |