Framing a welfare reform
The social benefits reform in Russia and Kazakhstan
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9640614 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elena Maltseva (0009-0007-4041-7627, University of Windsor, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 229-256 |
| Publication date | 2016-07-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Slavonic Papers (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-5006 • E-ISSN: 2375-2475 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00085006.2016.1202427 |
| OpenAlex | W2480572728 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 27 |
This article addresses the question of why some non-democratic governments are more successful than others at reforming their welfare institutions. Using the example of the Russian and Kazakhstani social benefits reform, the author will illustrate that in modern non-democratic regimes the importance of framing and effective communication with the public for the purpose of effective policymaking and regime legitimization is equal to, if not greater than, in established democracies. The successful implementation of the Kazakhstani social benefits reform, as opposed to Russia’s protracted experience with reforming its social benefits system, was determined not only by the configuration of various institutional and political factors, but also the skilful actions of the Kazakhstani authorities, who used effective communication strategies and framing techniques that resonated with the public and generated broad support for reform. Based on extensive research conducted in Russia and Kazakhstan in 2006–2010 as part of the author's doctoral dissertation at the University of Toronto, this paper enhances our understanding of political and public policy processes in transitional and non-democratic contexts and adds important details to our understanding of how post-Soviet autocrats run their countries and what methods they use to stay in power, manage their state affairs, and avoid public dissatisfaction
Democracy · Framing (construction · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Welfare · Welfare reform · Welfare state · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Russia and Soviet political economy
Kazakhstan
The Oligarchs
Privatizing Pensions
Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice
Is Anyone Responsible?
Reforming the State
Shocking Mother Russia
Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice
Putin's Challenge
Premature Deaths
Reform of in-kind benefits in Russia
The End of the Rollercoaster? Growth, Inequality and Poverty in Central Asia and the Caucasus
The Legacy of State Socialism and the Future of Transformation
The Social Construction of an Imperative
"Kazakhstan's Authoritarian "Persuasion
Framing Welfare Reform in Affluent Societies
Limits on Authoritarian Imposition of Policy
The Politics of Intergovernmental Transfers in Post-Soviet Russia
Ideas, institutions, and policy change
Discursive Institutionalism
Why Yeltsin Won
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |