From the Tabennisi nunnery to Pussy Riot
Female holy fools in Byzantium and Russia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9640652 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Svitlana Kobets (University of Toronto, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 87-107 |
| Publication date | 2018-04-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Slavonic Papers (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-5006 • E-ISSN: 2375-2475 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00085006.2018.1447741 |
| OpenAlex | W2800016826 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 16 |
In this paper, as the author explores the gendered aspects of the holy fool’s phenomenology, she argues that, despite the presumed egalitarianism and the fact that female holy fools appeared in Byzantine hagiography as early as the fifth century, throughout the history of holy foolishness the urban model – hagiographically established in the Byzantine vita of Simeon the Fool of Emesa – was available exclusively to males. Females, recently canonized by the Russian Orthodox Church as holy fools for Christ’s sake, completely lack such essential characteristics of holy foolishness as subversion, defiance, and folly, whereas the holy fool’s theatricality and rebellious ardour live on in the subversive performances of activist artists
Art · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Byzantine Studies and History · Islamic Studies and History
Perfect Fools
Hagiography and Modern Russian Literature
The Female Transvestite in Early Monasticism
Pussy Riot and the Holy Foolishness of Punk
Foolishness in Christ
Reading Renunciation
Is There a Harlot in This Text? Hagiography and the Grotesque
Understanding Russia
Holy Foolishness
A Short History of the Beginnings and Origins of These Present Wars in Moscow under the Reign of Various Sovereigns down to the Year 1610
The Paradigm of the Hebrew Prophet and the Russian Tradition of Iurodstvo
The Rise and Function of the Holy Man in Late Antiquity
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |