Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Old Polish “Chocia” and “Chociaj”

Bibliographic Data

ID9641789
AuthorsJames Ferrell (corresponding author)
Year1966
Volume8
Issue1
Pages68-71
Publication date1966-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Slavonic Papers (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0008-5006 • E-ISSN: 2375-2475
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00085006.1966.11417910
OpenAlexW2567690892
LanguageEN

the source of polish chocia and chociaj, both functioning as concessive subordinating conjunctions, has been the subject of a moderately large amount of scholarly literature. One will find listings of most of the important items in Max Vasmer's Russisches etymologisches Worterbuch (Heidelberg, 1958), III, 268 under xotja, and in Franciszek Siawski's Slownik etymologiczny jczyka polskiego (Krakow, 1952-6), I, 73 under choc. As Slawski has pointed out, the words would seem almost certainly to be formed from the theme of the verb chciec (archaic choclee) wish, cf. Latin quamvis, German obwohl. Certainly attempts like Osten-Sacken's in Anzeiger fur indogermanische Sprachund Altertumskunde (1911), XXVIII, 36, to derive chocia from an inflected form of choc cannot be regarded as successful. Nevertheless, Slawski observes, it is uncertain with what form of the verb chocia and chociaj are most closely related. Jan Los in Rocznik slawistyczny (1911), IV, 245-6, has argued that chocia is in origin a native Polish form of the nominative singular masculine of the present active participle of chociee. He explains the ending -a as modeled after the type of ending we find in the form reca, which is attested in the Kazania swictokrzyskie. He maintains that chocia, in view of the antiquity of its attestations, could not be a borrowing from East Slavic. However, Jan Rozwadowski, who had earlier, Rocznik slawistyczny (1909), II, 4, shared this viewpoint, on maturer reflection pointed out, in Jan Los, Jan Rozwadowski, Aleksander Bruckner, Jan Baudouin de Courtenay and Tytus Benin's Jczyk polski i jego historia z uwzglcdnieniem innych jczykow na ziemiach polskich (Krakow, 1915), I, 368-9, that the evidence for a present participle ending in -a in Old Polish is too fragile to build on. I believe that a careful consideration of the evidence will force one to agree with this conclusion whether one accepts the counter-theory that Rozwadowski proposes or not. More recently the question has been reopened by Zenon Klemensiewicz, in collaboration with T. Lehr-Sptawinski and S. Urbanczyk, in Gramatyka history czna jczyka polskiego (Warszawa, 1955), 502^-3. He notes die existence in Old Polish of the set of conjunctions choe

Geography · Political science · Central European Literary Studies · Language and Culture · Linguistics and language evolution

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae