ΛΗΚγΘΙΟΝ ΑΠΩΛΕСΕΝ

The phrase ληκύθιον ⋯πώλεсεν , which Aeschylus in the contest of Aristophanes' Frogs mockingly introduces into six of the prologues of his rival Euripides (twice into one of them), has recently attracted a great deal of attention. With a couple of exceptions those scholars who have discussed it during the last fifteen years agree that it contains a sexual innuendo. Where they differ is on the exact nature of its meaning. What vase shape does ληκύθιον or λήκυθοс denote and hence what part of the male genitalia is envisaged? Or is it mistaken to press for anatomical detail? May not the phrase simply suggest ‘become detumescent’? These are the questions that have been posed regarding Ar. Ran. 1200–47. In what follows I shall try to show that the context, far from demanding that we give an underlying sexual meaning as well as its surface meaning to the phrase, could almost be said positively to exclude such a meaning. In an attempt to be as brief as possible I shall not deal with all of the suggestions made by the scholars mentioned in my second footnote and rarely indicate points of agreement, disagreement or indebtedness. When I confront the arguments of these scholars they are mostly those of two of the most recent contributors to the debate, Snell and Anderson. At first sight there is some plausibility in the suggestion that lekythion might denote a penis or a pair of testicles or both things. Several vase shapes have a suggestive appearance. If the object denoted is actually the vase we are accustomed to call the aryballos, the reference would be to an object whose name possibly derived (in part) from a word which had a genital reference. It has also been suggested that this object was once manufactured from animals' testicles

Art · CONTEST · Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Linguistics · Literature · Meaning (existential · Object (grammar · Original meaning · Phrase · Physics · Sight · Theology · Classical Antiquity Studies · Families in Therapy and Culture · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Philosophy

• Speech within Speech in Menander

  René Nünlist•The language of Greek comedy•2002

  Add to list

• Comic Elements in Tragic Language

  Alan H Sommerstein•The language of Greek comedy•2002

  Add to list

• Some Orthographical Variants in the Papyri of Later Greek Comedy

  W Geoffrey Arnott•The language of Greek comedy•2002

  Add to list

• Μάγειρος ποιητής

  Gregory W Dobrov•The language of Greek comedy•2002

  Add to list

• Languages on Stage

  Andreas Willi•The language of Greek comedy•2002

  Add to list

• The Language of Greek Comedy

  Andreas Willi•The language of Greek comedy•2002

  Add to list

• The Language of Doric Comedy

  Albio Cesare Cassio•The language of Greek comedy•2002

  Add to list

• Figures of Speech in Aristophanes

  Simon R Slings•The language of Greek comedy•2002

  Add to list

• Some Evaluative Terms in Aristophanes

  K J Dover, Kenneth Dover•The language of Greek comedy•2002

  Add to list

• Ionian Iambos and Attic Komoidia

  Ewen Bowie•The language of Greek comedy•2002

  Add to list

• Antiche esegesi ‘paratragiche’ alle Rane di Aristofane ( scholl. vett. 1289β, 1294a–b Chantry). Riflessioni ecdotiche

  Pietro Berardi•Philologus•2026

  Add to list

• The Language of Greek Comedy

  Andreas Willi•The language of Greek comedy•2002

  Add to list

• Six Greek Verbs of Sexual Congress

  Open Access•David Bain•The Classical Quarterly•1991

  Add to list

• The Latin Sexual Vocabulary

  J N Adams•The Latin sexual vocabulary•1990

  Add to list

• (KΩIΔApion in Aristophanes' Frogs *)

  Robert J Penella•Mnemosyne•1973

  Add to list