Did Martial Have A Jewish Slave? (7.35)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9664151 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dwora Gilula (Hebrew University of Jerusalem, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1987 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 532-533 |
| Publication date | 1987-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Classical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0009-8388 • E-ISSN: 1471-6844 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0009838800030846 |
| OpenAlex | W2130509260 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 4 |
Mart. 11.75 is a variation on the same theme and may serve as a commentary on 7.35. As it was not common to wear clothing in the bath, a Roman lady not wanting mentulam videre (11.75.4) should not have gone to a public bath, where all the nude males, including Martial and his slave (7.35.3–4), were definitely not spadones (11.75.6; cf. 7.35.6)
Aesthetics · Archaeology · Art · Clothing · Judaism · Literature · Martial arts · Political science · Theme (computing · Visual arts · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Computer Science · History · Law
| Citations per year | 0.07 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2012 - 2012 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |