The Asotodidaskalos Attributed To Alexis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9664177 |
|---|---|
| Authors | W Geoffrey Arnott (University of North Carolina at Pembroke, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1955 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Pages | 210-216 |
| Publication date | 1955-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Classical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0009-8388 • E-ISSN: 1471-6844 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0009838800011472 |
| OpenAlex | W2165562950 |
| Language | EN |
From these words of Athenaeus, the majority of scholars have come to the Dnclusion that the Asotodidaskalos was not, despite what Sotion says, composed by Alexis, but is a forgery; and some even go so far as to attribute the forgery to Sotion himself. Yet nowhere do they support their views with sufficient rguments; nowhere has the question, in the light of all the evidence, both sternal and internal, been fully considered. Meineke ( Fragmenta Comicorum Graecorum , i. 397 f.) has indeed given clear reasons for his belief that the play as not written by Alexis, in objecting to three usages in the cited fragment as unattic (see II below); but these objections are not all justifiable, as Kock has lown in the case of ( Comicorum Atticorum Fragmenta , ii. 307), or together inclusive enough to make us reject the fragment out of hand
Art · Literature · Reflexive pronoun · Byzantine Studies and History · Classical Antiquity Studies · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|