The Monkey's Off Our Back

An Alternative Reading of Juvenal 5.153–5

Bibliographic Data

ID9664324
AuthorsRyan M Pasco (corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume70
Issue1
Pages347-355
Publication date2020-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Classical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0009-8388 • E-ISSN: 1471-6844
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0009838820000336
OpenAlexW3030835939
LanguageEN
References cited14

Readers have struggled to interpret an image from the end of Juvenal's fifth satire, a poem which focusses upon the poor hospitality shown to a dinner guest, Trebius, at the hands of his host, Virro. After repeatedly juxtaposing the luxurious food served to Virro with the scant fare served to Trebius, Juvenal describes the final course of the cena . He again contrasts the host's hyper-abundance with his guest's mere scraps (5.149–55): Virro sibi et reliquis Virronibus illa iubebit poma dari, quorum solo pascaris odore, qualia perpetuus Phaeacum autumnus habebat, credere quae possis subrepta sororibus Afris: tu scabie frueris mali, quod in aggere rodit qui tegitur parma et galea, metuensque flagelli discit ab hirsuta iaculum torquere capella. Virro will demand that he and the rest of his entourage receive these apples—though you'll dine on their smell alone—like those the endless autumn of the Phaeacians used to yield, which you could believe stolen away from the African sisters: you will enjoy the scab of an apple, which, on the Embankment, is gnawed by someone who is protected by a buckler and helm and who, fearing a whipping, learns to hurl a javelin from atop a shaggy goat. While the core contrast between the quality of each type of fare is clear, the concluding qui -clause is less intelligible. Who could this entity be? On line 153, the scholiast comments: quale simia manducat . While quale could refer to the object being eaten ( scabie mali quod ) rather than to the qui -antecedent, it is clear in any case that the ancient reader felt that 5.153–5 evoked the image of an ape. Recent commentaries on Juvenal's fifth satire reflect a scholarly consensus: J.D. Duff, Edward Courtney, Susanna Braund and Biagio Santorelli all follow the scholiast's suggestion and believe that the passage describes a trained ape, as do recent readers of the poem

Art · Art history · Humanities · Literature · Poetry · Classical Antiquity Studies · Historical and Literary Analyses · Historical and Literary Studies

Tools

Open DOI