Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Maxentius as Xerxes in Eusebius of Caesarea's Accounts of the Battle of the Milvian Bridge

Bibliographic Data

ID9664447
AuthorsAdam Serfass (Kenyon College, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume72
Issue2
Pages822-833
Publication date2022-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Classical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0009-8388 • E-ISSN: 1471-6844
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0009838822000660
OpenAlexW4361279695
LanguageEN
References cited15

Of the many accounts of the Battle of the Milvian Bridge in a.d. 312 written soon after the conflict, only those of Eusebius of Caesarea have Maxentius cross the Tiber on a bridge of boats to face the forces of Constantine. This detail, it is here argued, suggests that Maxentius may be seen as a latter-day Xerxes, the Persian emperor who, in preparation for his invasion of Greece in 480 b.c. , famously spanned the Hellespont with a pair of boat-bridges. The article first reviews the seminal accounts of Xerxes’ feat in Aeschylus’ Persians and Herodotus’ Histories , and next discusses the story's long afterlife in subsequent Greek (and Latin) authors, including those of Late Antiquity. Close analysis of Eusebius’ battle narratives in his Ecclesiastical History (9.9.3–8) and in his Life of Constantine (1.38) reveals that their vocabulary echoes the distinctive language used by Aeschylus, Herodotus and later writers in reference to Xerxes’ achievement. The article concludes by exploring the implications of this identification of Maxentius with Xerxes. It exemplifies two venerable tactics in Roman political propaganda: that of portraying a native rival as a foreign enemy and that of mapping the Persian Wars onto contemporary events. As Xerxes rediuiuus , Maxentius is cast as the quintessential barbarian tyrant, an Eastern despot resident in Rome

Ancient history · Art · Barbarian · Battle · Bridge (graph theory · Emperor · Late Antiquity · Literature · Politics · Byzantine Studies and History · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Law

  • Form and thought in Herodotus

    Henry R Immerwahr•Form and thought in Herodotus•1986

  • Herodotus and the natural world

    Open Access•James Romm•The Cambridge companion to…•2006

  • ‘The Only Event Mightier Than Everyone’s Hope’

    Open Access•David J Devore•Histos•2020

  • Jordanes and the Date of the Epitome de Caesaribus

    Open Access•Justin Stover, Justin A Stover et al.•Histos•2021

  • The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine

    Open Access•Noel Emmanuel Lenski, Bruno Bleckmann et al.•The Cambridge companion to the…•2005

  • The Historical Method of Herodotus

    Donald Lateiner•Historical Method of Herodotus•1989

  • Constantine and the Christian Empire

    Charles M Odahl, Charles Odahl•Constantine and the Christian…•2010

  • Greek Glory, Constantinian Legend

    Dimitris Krallis•Journal of late antiquity•2014

  • Symbiosis and Civil War

    Maggie L Popkin•Journal of late antiquity•2016

  • Reconsidering the frieze on the Arch of Constantine

    Open Access•C Brian Rose•Journal of Roman Archaeology•2021

  • The Greek Tyrant and Roman Political Invective of the Late Republic

    J Roger Dunkle•Transactions and Proceedings of…•1967

  • The Rhetorical Tyrant in Roman Historiography

    J Roger Dunkle•The Classical World•1971

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae