Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Two ‘Syntactic Errors’ in Transcription

Seneca, Thyestes 33 and Lucan, B.C .279

Bibliographic Data

ID9664799
AuthorsJohn N Grant (University of Toronto, corresponding author)
Year1994
Volume44
Issue1
Pages282-286
Publication date1994-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Classical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0009-8388 • E-ISSN: 1471-6844
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0009838800017419
OpenAlexW2103459309
LanguageEN

Some of the more difficult archetypal corruptions to detect are those that occurred, not when a scribe was mindlessly copying what was before him, but when he was paying some attention to the sense of his text and departed from his exemplar by wrongly anticipating how the sequence of thought would develop. The resulting text may give sense, even though it does not reflect what the author wrote. It is suggested here that such a process led to corruption at Seneca, Thyestes 33 and Lucan, B.C . 2.279. In the former what was originally the subject of a verb has been transformed into the object; in the latter, the reverse has occurred

Art · Biology · Copying · Linguistics · Literature · Object (grammar · Subject (documents · Transcription (linguistics · Verb · World Wide Web · Ancient Egypt and Archaeology · Classical Antiquity Studies · Computer Science · Genetics · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Philosophy · Psychology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae