Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Note on the Oxford Latin Dictionary Definition of Irrvmo

Bibliographic Data

ID9664829
AuthorsAven Mcmaster (0000-0002-5485-5392, Thorneloe University, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume68
Issue2
Pages714-716
Publication date2018-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Classical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0009-8388 • E-ISSN: 1471-6844
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0009838818000459
OpenAlexW2899657136
LanguageEN
References cited4

In the second edition of the Oxford Latin Dictionary (2012) an otherwise laudable attempt to be more forthright in defining obscene terms seems to have introduced an error. The word irrumo was defined in the first edition of the dictionary as ‘to practise irrumatio on’, which is correct but unilluminating, especially since irrumatio was defined as ‘the action of an irrumator ’. Irrumator was then defined as ‘one who submits to fellatio ’, which is technically correct, though it suggests a passivity in the action that is not found in the lines from Catullus given as an example of its usage: praesertim quibus esset irrumator | praetor, nec faceret pili cohortem (‘not least when said praetor was a fuckface | and didn't give a shit for his poor staffers’, Catull. 10.11–12). In this poem Catullus is using the word irrumator as a term of abuse, suggesting that his praetor (in Bithynia) took advantage of his staff members rather than taking care that they too should reap some rewards from the province. Although the literal meaning is secondary to a more metaphorical use here, the charge is repeated with more direct reference to its sexual usage in Catull. 28.9–10: o Memmi, bene me ac diu supinum | tota ista trabe lentus irrumasti (‘Memmius, man, you really reamed me over, | force-fed me slowly with that giant whanger!’). In both cases it is clear that Catullus is an unwilling recipient of the praetor's attentions, and the action is aggressive and demonstrates the latter's ability to dominate his victim. It would not therefore be correct to say that Memmius is ‘submitting to fellatio ’ at the hands, or rather mouth, of Catullus, even metaphorically. The term fellatio , by the way, was not defined in the original OLD at all, and the verb fello had, as its second sense, only ‘transf., as a sexual perversion’. The definitions as given therefore seem deliberately obscure, as well as misleading about the roles and intent of the people involved

Action (physics · Epistemology · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Original meaning · Physics · Poetry · Sociology · Word (group theory · Classical Antiquity Studies · Historical and Literary Studies · History · Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods · Philosophy

  • Oxford Latin Dictionary

    P G W Glare•Oxford Latin Dictionary•1969

  • The Latin Sexual Vocabulary

    J N Adams•The Latin sexual vocabulary•1990

  • The Garden of Priapus

    Amy Richlin, J P Sullivan•The garden of Priapus•1992

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae