The Textual Tradition of Quintilian 10. 1. 46f
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9664985 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Winterbottom (United Church of Christ, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1962 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 169-175 |
| Publication date | 1962-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Classical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0009-8388 • E-ISSN: 1471-6844 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0009838800011733 |
| OpenAlex | W2151002063 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 1 |
This article does not set out to cast doubts on the established textual basis of the bulk of Quintilian's Institutio , or on the history of the work's fortunes in the Middle Ages. What I say about these things will be unoriginal and, I hope, uncontroversial. My object, however, is to show that what is true of the bulk is not true of 10. 1. 46–131; and to fill in some details in the history of the tradition
Art · Linguistics · Literature · Object (grammar · Programming language · Set (abstract data type · Classical Antiquity Studies · Computer Science · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,06 |
| Citation span | 1991 - 2021 (31) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |