Hermodorus of Syracuse and Sextus Empiricus’ ‘Pythagoreans’ on Categories and Principles
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9664997 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Roberto Granieri (0000-0003-1598-5650, KU Leuven, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 368-382 |
| Publication date | 2023-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Classical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0009-8388 • E-ISSN: 1471-6844 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0009838823000423 |
| OpenAlex | W4381379042 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 19 |
Hermodorus of Syracuse, a Sicilian disciple of Plato, is reported by Simplicius to have set out a classification of beings, which is of a piece with an argument for principle monism ( in Ph. 247.30–248.18 > F 5 IP 2 ; 256.28–257.4 = F 6 IP 2 ). A similar classification appears in Sextus Empiricus’ Aduersus mathematicos X ( 262–75 ) , where it is officially ascribed to some ‘Pythagoreans’ ( Πυθαγορικοί ) or ‘children of the Pythagoreans’ ( Πυθαγορικῶν παῖδες ), but seems ultimately based on Early Academic material. Virtually all commentators have read these classifications conjointly. More radically, both have been taken to record Plato's oral teaching and to give essentially the same categorial scheme, which is regarded as the most developed instance of a so-called ‘Academic doctrine of the categories’. This article re-examines these texts and provides an alternative reading. Section 1 focusses on Hermodorus and defends three theses: (1) there was never such a thing as an ‘Academic doctrine of the categories’; (2) Hermodorus does not seem to recount what Plato said, but to propose an integrated interpretation and defence of aspects of his thought; (3) Hermodorus’ pronouncements about principles are incompatible with other testimonies on Plato's unwritten teaching, notably Aristotle's. Section 2 moves to Sextus and defends a fourth thesis: (4) despite their similarities, the classifications of Hermodorus and Sextus’ Pyrhagoreans are considerably different, though perhaps originated from the same debate
Argument (complex analysis · Art · Doctrine · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Literature · Monism · Reading (process · Section (typography · Theology · Chemistry · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Computer Science · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · Philosophy
Heresiography in Context
The Discovery of Things
On What Grounds What
The Categories of Being in Plato’s Sophist 255c-e
Zweifelhaftes im Corpus Aristotelicum
Plato’s Absolute and Relative Categories at Sophist 255c14
Sextus Empiricus
Plato's Account of Falsehood
The Modes of Scepticism
Platonismus und hellenistische Philosophie
The Heirs of Plato
Attic Greek Prose Syntax
Forms and first principles
La filosofia del primo Aristotele
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |