Opening Up Texts

Flavian Interactions in Statius’ Thebaid and Silius Italicus’ Pvnica

Bibliographic Data

ID9666239
AuthorsDalida Agri (0000-0003-1588-0170, University of Manchester, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume70
Issue1
Pages310-331
Publication date2020-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Classical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0009-8388 • E-ISSN: 1471-6844
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0009838820000397
OpenAlexW3034232443
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited30

This article adopts a revisionist approach to the intertextual relationship between Statius’ Thebaid and Silius Italicus’ Punica , two contemporary Flavian epics that interact with one another (first century a.d. ). As such, this is not only an excellent illustration of intertextuality in action but also a prime example of how texts can be read in either direction depending on which takes precedence. Since both epics overlap in time, it is precisely the difficulty in establishing the direction of influence between the two poets that opens up texts in creative ways by allowing further readings. Of course, such an overlap calls for a shift in power from the author onto the reader in constructing meaning in text. However, textual evidence only allows us to do so much. It is my contention that Statius could not have interacted with Silius’ Punica beyond a.d. 92, which is the year when he published his Thebaid . This is also the year when Silius is thought to have composed Book 12 of the Punica . Therefore, Statius could only effectively engage with Silius up to Punica Book 12, it seems, while Silius carried on writing the remainder of his seventeen-book-long epic. Still, there is ample material from Statius’ Thebaid and Silius’ Punica Books 1–12 to explore in terms of mutual influence. A critical trend in Flavian scholarship has produced a list of parallels between the two epics showing Silius’ potential borrowing from Statius and vice versa. As recently discussed in Ripoll's study, the most significant parallel inviting close comparison is Hannibal's siege of Rome in Punica Book 12 and Capaneus’ assault on Thebes in Thebaid Book 10. In this article, I would like to return to these two specific episodes and read them alongside each other. The purpose of the reading is to evaluate whether this single interaction changes the model of how we think about the intertextual activity between Silius and Statius, before the final publication of the Thebaid in a.d. 92, when Statius could still revise, amend and polish in the light of the Punica

Art · EPIC · Epistemology · Intertextuality · Literature · Meaning (existential · Parallels · Punica · Scholarship · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · History · Law · Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOI