Putting the Cratylus in its Place
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9666283 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mary Margaret Mackenzie (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1986 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 124-150 |
| Publication date | 1986-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Classical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0009-8388 • E-ISSN: 1471-6844 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0009838800010600 |
| OpenAlex | W2141339727 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 21 |
| References cited | 19 |
The Cratylus begins with a paradox; it ends with a paradox; and it has a paradox in between. But this disturbing characteristic of the dialogue has been overshadowed, not to say ignored, in the literature. For commentators have seen it as their task to discover exactly what theory of language Plato himself, despite his declared perplexity, intends to adopt as he rejects the alternatives of Hermogenes and Cratylus. A common view, then, has been to suppose that the ⋯πορίαι of the dialogue are mere camouflage for the hidden dogma, whatever that may be. A favoured candidate, of course, has been the theory of transcendent forms, in some preliminary version. As a consequence, the dialogue has often been seen as a precursor to the great metaphysical works of Plato's middle period such as the Phaedo or the Republic . Not so, I shall argue. My case is that this dialogue centres upon a series of paradoxes which are both powerful and unsettling. Their final effect is to attack the theory of forms, not to defend it. They are, I suggest, genuine proposals of philosophical difficulty, rather than mere artifice to disguise an idealist truth. As such, they belong, and may clearly be seen to belong, with works of the critical period which subject the theory of forms to scrutiny. Thus the ⋯πορίαι of the Cratylus have their counterparts in the Parmenides , the Theaetetus and the Sophist . I propose, then, that the dialogue was written during the late, critical period of Plato's philosophical activity
Aesthetics · Epistemology · Metaphysics · Period (music · Perplexity · Philosophy of language · Reflexive pronoun · Scrutiny · Sophist · Subject (documents · Theology · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Computer Science · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · Philosophy · Philosophy, Science, and History
Plato on the Metaphysical Foundation of Meaning and Truth
Plato on Education and Art
Plato's Metaphysics
Plato on Love
Plato in his Time and Place
Plato and Platonism
Plato's Account of Falsehood
The Cratylus of Plato
Plato's Philosophy of Language
Plato's Cratylus
The Oxford Handbook of Plato
The argument and structure of Plato's Phaedrus
Plato's Epistemology
Plato's Utopia Recast
Plato's Ethics
The Sophist on Statements, Predication, and Falsehood
Oráculo De Crátilo E O Sonho De Sócrates
The Case for the 399 BCE Dramatic Date of Plato’s Cratylus
The Idea(s) of Order of Platonic Dialogues and Their Hermeneutic Consequences
The Virtues of Socratic Ignorance
Lectures DuCratyle, 1960-1990
Socrates
Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics
Plato on Not-Being
Socrates and the Jury
Cratylus' theory of names and its refutation
Clarendon Plato Series
The Theory of Ideas in the Cratylus
Names, Forms and Conventionalism
The Place of the Philebus in Plato's Dialogues1
The Material and Sources of Plato's Dream
Protagoras and Self-Refutation in Plato's Theaetetus
The Unity of the Platonic Dialogue
Protagoras and Self-Refutation in Later Greek Philosophy
Plato on Naming
Plato's Paradox That the Immutable Is Unknowable
Notes On Plato's Theaetetus
A Displacement in the Text of the Cratylus
Plato's Theory of Ideas
| Unique citing works | 21 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,53 |
| Citation span | 1986 - 2022 (37) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 21 |