Notes on Statius, Thebaid 2
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9666680 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kyle Gervais (Western University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 411-414 |
| Publication date | 2015-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Classical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0009-8388 • E-ISSN: 1471-6844 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0009838814000020 |
| OpenAlex | W2312424056 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
The recent edition of the Thebaid by Hall, Ritchie, and Edwards launched a successful attack on the communis opinio of a bipartite manuscript tradition, with one clearly superior family (represented by the ninth-century P [ Puteanus ] manuscript), and relatively few textual problems. In doing so, they underscored the need for renewed editorial work on the poem. Here I discuss five passages from Thebaid 2 that have not received adequate attention from editors
Art · Art history · Literature · Ninth · Poetry · Chemical synthesis and alkaloids · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · History · Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |