When Policy Comes to Town
Discourses and Dilemmas of Implementation of a Statewide Reentry Policy in Kansas
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9680652 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andres F Rengifo (0000-0003-3345-5055, School of Criminal Justice Rutgers University—Newark, corresponding author), DON STEMEN (Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology Loyola University Chicago), Ethan Amidon (Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice Missouri State University) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 603-630 |
| Publication date | 2017-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Criminology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0011-1384 • E-ISSN: 1745-9125 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1745-9125.12146 |
| OpenAlex | W2627992703 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 35 |
In this case study, we document challenges to reform implementation posed by line staff, supervisors, and managers during a large‐scale realignment of the Kansas Department of Corrections (KDOC) in which they sought to replace a traditional approach of “risk containment” focused on surveillance and incarceration with a new model of “risk reduction” focused on service delivery and reintegration. We draw on interviews, observations, and archival research to document the staff's discursive challenges to the rollout of the new policy. More specifically, we describe how varying challenges to the reforms—“denial,” “dismissal,” and “defiance”—reflect actors’ positions within the organization, the local contexts in which they operate, and more general frames of interpretation of the long‐term orientation of the KDOC. We integrate these perspectives to contribute to the ongoing expansion of conventional models of penal change that highlight the role of actors and local social and institutional context as moderators of the gap between “law on the books” and “law in action.”
Context (archaeology · Criminology · Denial · Dismissal · Interpretation (philosophy · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law · Policing Practices and Perceptions · Psychology · Public Administration · Regulation and Compliance Studies
Examining the “On the Books” Versus “In the Field” Impacts of Probation Reform
Police Discretion and Restorative Justice in China
“Court Can Happen Anywhere”
From Bright Plots to Blind Spots
Disruption in the Court Community
Progressive and Traditional Orientations to Prosecution
Medicaid reimbursement for community violence intervention and prevention (CVI)
Risk and punishment
A test of the bifurcation hypothesis in prosecutorial diversion
Contesting market rationality
The Mississippi model
Careers in Criminalization
Prosecutors, court communities, and policy change
The Promise and Challenge of Local Initiatives That Support Reentry and Reintegration
Discourses of Mass Probation
Early 21st century penal reform
Caught
Evolving Interpretations as a Change Unfolds
Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence
Misalignment in Supervision
Mass incarceration, legal change, and locale
Risk, responsibility and reconfiguration
Public Protection, Partnership and Risk Penality
How iron is the iron cage of new penology
Theorizing punishment’s boundaries
How Judges Think About Racial Disparities
Does the Front Line Reflect the Party Line? The Politicization of Punishment and Prison Officers’ Perspectives Towards Incarceration
Framing Organizational Reform
Making Sense of COMPSTAT
The Law-Before
The Organizational and Social Foundations of Worker Resistance
Prisoners' Adjustment, Correctional Officers, and Context
Waste Managers? The New Penology, Crime Fighting, and Parole Agent Identity
Legal Change and Sentencing Norms in the Wake of Booker
Transforming Symbolic Law into Organizational Action
The Adventures of Managerial Hegemony
Constructing a Market, Performing Theory
Institutionalized Organizations
Ain't Misbehavin'? Opportunities for Resistance under New Forms of 'Quality' Management
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |