The Ghost Budget
U.S. War Spending & Fiscal Transparency
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9684673 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Linda J Bilmes (0000-0002-0969-8092, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 154 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 87-105 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-20 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Daedalus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0011-5266 • E-ISSN: 1548-6192 |
| Publisher | MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1162/daed.a.943 |
| OpenAlex | W4416430793 |
| Language | EN |
Most experts maintain that oversight, including ex post oversight, is critical to ensure that government actions are transparent and accountable to its citizens. But despite a global push for greater transparency in government, the level of transparency over national security and public spending in many countries is limited. This essay shows that since 9/11, the conduct of the United States in the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the wider region has diminished oversight over military spending by funding operations with “emergency ” appropriations and other special budgetary vehicles, financing with debt, concealing expenses through poor accounting, and integrating the private sector into core military activities. This combination of policies, which I term the Ghost Budget, has resulted in less accountability for war spending, lower civic engagement, greater corruption, higher total expenditures, and prolonged conflicts
Accountability · Core (optical fiber · Government (linguistics · Government spending · Private sector · Public spending · Transparency (behavior · Corruption and Economic Development · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|