Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From Anti-Government to Anti-Science

Why Conservatives Have Turned Against Science

Bibliographic Data

ID9684889
AuthorsNaomi Oreskes (0000-0001-6122-9843, corresponding author), Erik M Conway
Year2022
Volume151
Issue4
Pages98-123
Publication date2022-11-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDaedalus (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0011-5266 • E-ISSN: 1548-6192
PublisherMIT Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1162/daed_a_01946
OpenAlexW4312502475
LanguageEN
Citations received39

Empirical data do not support the conclusion of a crisis of public trust in science. They do support the conclusion of a crisis of conservative trust in science: polls show that American attitudes toward science are highly polarized along political lines. In this essay, we argue that conservative hostility toward science is rooted in conservative hostility toward government regulation of the marketplace, which has morphed in recent decades into conservative hostility to government, tout court. This distrust was cultivated by conservative business leaders for nearly a century, but took strong hold during the Reagan administration, largely in response to scientific evidence of environmental crises that invited governmental response. Thus, science-particularly environmental and public health science-became the target of conservative anti-regulatory attitudes. We argue that contemporary distrust of science is mostly collateral damage, a spillover from carefully orchestrated conservative distrust of government

Collateral · Distrust · Government (linguistics · Hostility · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Academic Freedom and Politics · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Law · Psychology · Public Administration · Social Psychology

  • Signs of Fissures? Business Influence, Local Political Orientation, and U.S. Communities’ Climate Policy

    Open Access•Lazarus Adua, Linda Lobao•Sociological Quarterly•2026

  • Public perceptions of scientists’ motives and support for therapeutic gene editing

    Open Access•Noy, Timothy L O’brien•Social Problems•2026

  • Conservative politics is more strongly associated with skepticism about science than is conservative religion - and both restrain enthusiasm more than they encourage negativity

    Open Access•Karyn Vilbig, P Dimaggio•Social Forces•2026

  • Algunas reflexiones sobre las razones doctrinarias del ataque paleolibertario a la ciencia pública argentina

    Open Access•Matías Leandro Saidel•Question•2024

  • Factors related to user perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI)-based content moderation on social media

    Open Access•Sai Wang•Computers in Human Behavior•2023

  • Navigating distrust and competing priorities during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Rachel Waldman, Rachel N Waldman et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • We Do It for Other Reasons. It’s Conservation, It’s the Right Thing to Do”

    Open Access•Christopher Weatherly, Joonmo Kang•Journal of Community Practice•2026

  • Political polarization of trust in science

    Open Access•B V E Hyde•Public Understanding of Science•2026

  • Explaining Partisan Differences in Postsecondary Policy Support

    David R Johnson, Timothy L O’brien•The Journal of Higher Education•2026

  • The power of second-order conspiracies

    Open Access•Alexios Stamatiadis-Bréhier•Inquiry•2025

  • Ignorance Is Strength

    Open Access•Leo E Strine, Jr Leo E Strine•Journal of Law and Political…•2025

  • Who is perceived to be an expert on Covid-19 vaccines on social media? Biomedical credentials confer expertise, even among vaccine-hesitant and conservative observers

    Madeline Jalbert, Mallory Harris et al.•Information Communication & Society•2025

  • Rapidly diverging public trust in science in the United States

    Open Access•Manjana Milkoreit, E Keith Smith•Public Understanding of Science•2025

  • Who believes in science? A computational tool for identifying language invoking or disputing scientific knowledge

    Open Access•R Wetts, Dan Kitson•Public Understanding of Science•2026

  • A four-level model of political polarization over science

    Open Access•Roderik Rekker•Public Understanding of Science•2025

  • Conduits or Alternative Providers? Christian Ministers’ as Gateway Providers in an Age of Polarization

    Open Access•Brian W Haggard•Society and Mental Health•2026

  • “The rebels are Republicans now”

    Open Access•Francesco Nasi•European Journal of Cultural…•2026

  • Rusting Bodies

    Open Access•Sanaullah Khan•City & Society•2026

  • Seeing the same evidence differently

    Open Access•Robin Bayes•Political Psychology•2026

  • Partisan identity, scientific and religious authority, and lawmaker support for science policy

    Open Access•Timothy L O’brien, Timothy L O'Brien et al.•Social Forces•2025

  • Denialist vs. warmist climate change conspiracy beliefs

    Open Access•Dylan De Gourville, Karen M Douglas et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2025

  • Does survey branding matter for human dimensions of natural resources research? A case study of university- and government-branded surveys

    Amanda N Van Buskirk, B Bynum Boley et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2023

  • The Politics of Pandemic Emotions

    Open Access•P Froese, Rebecca Bonhag•Social Currents•2024

  • Who should lead nuclear fusion research? Cross-national evidence on public–private governance preferences in Europe

    Open Access•A Giacometti, Christian Oltra et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2025

  • Affective Climate and Political Polarization

    Open Access•E Huddart Kennedy, Emily Huddart et al.•Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue…•2026

  • Science Shouldn't Be Political

    Open Access•B V E Hyde•Journal of Academic Ethics•2026

  • Value-Based Narratives Foster Trust in Scientists and Communication Behaviors

    Open Access•Janet Z Yang, Laura Arpan et al.•Science Communication•2025

  • Reverse Healthism and Antiscience Healthism

    Open Access•D Lupton•Sociology of Health & Illness•2026

  • Continuity and Change in Trust in Scientists in the United States

    Open Access•Jonathan Schulman, James N Druckman et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2025

  • The Masked Identity

    Mohamad Zreik•Comparative American Studies An…•2026

  • Negacionismo y errores cognitivos? El origen social de las preferencias

    Open Access•Ernesto Ganuza, Alfredo Ramos•Revista Española de Investigaciones…•2026

  • Geopolitical currents and contested science

    Liqian Wu, Xiaoxiao Cheng•Environmental Politics•2026

  • Their Truth is Out There

    Open Access•Megan E Cullinan, M Zimdars et al.•Social Media + Society•2024

  • Science and the Pulpit

    Open Access•Noy, Timothy L O’brien•Journal for the Scientific Study…•2024

  • Is glacier science undone, or just enough for a just transition? Reflections from Andean Mines

    Open Access•Javiera Barandiarán, Paola Araya et al.•Tapuya Latin American Science…•2025

  • Polarización ideológica en torno a la ciencia en España

    Open Access•Francisco Javier Jiménez-Loaisa, Diana Jareño-Ruiz•methaodos revista de ciencias…•2024

  • Culturally Responsive Methodologies

    Open Access•Lorien S Jordan, Jori N Hall•Qualitative Health Research•2025

  • Roots of Distrust

    Open Access•Federico Brandmayr•Cultural Sociology•2025

  • Religion, Perceptions of Scientists' Moral Culture, and Support for Science in the United States

    Open Access•Timothy L O’brien, Noy•American Sociological Review•2025

Unique citing works39
Citations per year13
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 38

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae