From Anti-Government to Anti-Science
Why Conservatives Have Turned Against Science
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9684889 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Naomi Oreskes (0000-0001-6122-9843, corresponding author), Erik M Conway |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 151 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 98-123 |
| Publication date | 2022-11-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Daedalus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0011-5266 • E-ISSN: 1548-6192 |
| Publisher | MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1162/daed_a_01946 |
| OpenAlex | W4312502475 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 39 |
Empirical data do not support the conclusion of a crisis of public trust in science. They do support the conclusion of a crisis of conservative trust in science: polls show that American attitudes toward science are highly polarized along political lines. In this essay, we argue that conservative hostility toward science is rooted in conservative hostility toward government regulation of the marketplace, which has morphed in recent decades into conservative hostility to government, tout court. This distrust was cultivated by conservative business leaders for nearly a century, but took strong hold during the Reagan administration, largely in response to scientific evidence of environmental crises that invited governmental response. Thus, science-particularly environmental and public health science-became the target of conservative anti-regulatory attitudes. We argue that contemporary distrust of science is mostly collateral damage, a spillover from carefully orchestrated conservative distrust of government
Collateral · Distrust · Government (linguistics · Hostility · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Academic Freedom and Politics · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Law · Psychology · Public Administration · Social Psychology
Signs of Fissures? Business Influence, Local Political Orientation, and U.S. Communities’ Climate Policy
Public perceptions of scientists’ motives and support for therapeutic gene editing
Conservative politics is more strongly associated with skepticism about science than is conservative religion - and both restrain enthusiasm more than they encourage negativity
Algunas reflexiones sobre las razones doctrinarias del ataque paleolibertario a la ciencia pública argentina
Factors related to user perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI)-based content moderation on social media
Navigating distrust and competing priorities during the Covid-19 pandemic
We Do It for Other Reasons. It’s Conservation, It’s the Right Thing to Do”
Political polarization of trust in science
Explaining Partisan Differences in Postsecondary Policy Support
The power of second-order conspiracies
Ignorance Is Strength
Who is perceived to be an expert on Covid-19 vaccines on social media? Biomedical credentials confer expertise, even among vaccine-hesitant and conservative observers
Rapidly diverging public trust in science in the United States
Who believes in science? A computational tool for identifying language invoking or disputing scientific knowledge
A four-level model of political polarization over science
Conduits or Alternative Providers? Christian Ministers’ as Gateway Providers in an Age of Polarization
“The rebels are Republicans now”
Rusting Bodies
Seeing the same evidence differently
Partisan identity, scientific and religious authority, and lawmaker support for science policy
Denialist vs. warmist climate change conspiracy beliefs
Does survey branding matter for human dimensions of natural resources research? A case study of university- and government-branded surveys
The Politics of Pandemic Emotions
Who should lead nuclear fusion research? Cross-national evidence on public–private governance preferences in Europe
Affective Climate and Political Polarization
Science Shouldn't Be Political
Value-Based Narratives Foster Trust in Scientists and Communication Behaviors
Reverse Healthism and Antiscience Healthism
Continuity and Change in Trust in Scientists in the United States
The Masked Identity
Negacionismo y errores cognitivos? El origen social de las preferencias
Geopolitical currents and contested science
Their Truth is Out There
Science and the Pulpit
Is glacier science undone, or just enough for a just transition? Reflections from Andean Mines
Polarización ideológica en torno a la ciencia en España
Culturally Responsive Methodologies
Roots of Distrust
Religion, Perceptions of Scientists' Moral Culture, and Support for Science in the United States
| Unique citing works | 39 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 13 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 38 |