Toward a 2.0 Compact for the Liberal Arts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9684933 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elizabeth Lewis (0000-0002-0963-2720, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, corresponding author), Earl Lewis (0000-0001-5035-3339) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 148 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 217-234 |
| Publication date | 2019-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Daedalus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0011-5266 • E-ISSN: 1548-6192 |
| Publisher | MIT Press - Journals (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1162/daed_a_01768 |
| OpenAlex | W2974605918 |
| Language | EN |
New demands on learning coupled with new concerns about a changing world have resulted in a new focus on what constitutes a durable learning experience in a liberal arts setting. While the noise of a crisis in the liberal arts can be distracting at times, what we learn is that different types of schools continue to answer the question of why the liberal arts remain an effective educational option. This essay argues that they are only beginning to address what is durable and adaptable about the liberal arts in the face of automation. While many have endorsed the LEAP (Liberal Education and America's Promise) framework developed by the American Association of Colleges & Universities, which called for the liberal arts to be in the nation's service, the original framework did not fully anticipate the rate, scale, and far-reaching impact of automation. What is needed is a liberal arts 2.0, one that prepares learners to become robot-proof in a world in which many will find themselves with robotic helpers
Aesthetics · Arts in education · Business · Higher education · Liberal arts education · Liberal education · Pedagogy · Political science · Public relations · Service (business · Sociology · The arts · Digital Education and Society · Law · Marketing · Philosophy · Service-Learning and Community Engagement
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |