CREATE a Revolution in Undergraduates' Understanding of Science
Teach through Close Analysis of Scientific Literature
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9684953 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sally G Hoskins (National Academy of Engineering, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 148 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 138-163 |
| Publication date | 2019-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Daedalus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0011-5266 • E-ISSN: 1548-6192 |
| Publisher | MIT Press - Journals (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1162/daed_a_01764 |
| OpenAlex | W2974298685 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
The teaching of science to undergraduates aligns poorly with the practice of science, leading many students to conclude that research is boring and researchers themselves are antisocial geniuses. Creativity, a key driver of scientific progress, is underemphasized or ignored altogether in many classrooms, as teaching focuses on the complex integrated concepts and voluminous amounts of information typical of STEM curricula. Faculty, largely untrained in science education per se, teach largely as they were taught, through lectures based in textbooks. This situation could change, and students' understanding of research practice could be fostered relatively easily, if faculty began teaching classes focused on the journal articles they read in their professional lives. In this essay, I outline a novel scaffolded approach to guiding students in a) deciphering the complexities of scientific literature and b) the process of gaining new understanding of who scientists are, what they do, how they do it, and why
Creativity · Curriculum · Engineering ethics · Genius · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Science education · Sociology · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Engineering · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy · Various Chemistry Research Topics
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,14 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2019 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |