Biophilia & Military Degrowth
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9685001 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J Livingston (0000-0001-6845-6694, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 152 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 100-104 |
| Publication date | 2023-02-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Daedalus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0011-5266 • E-ISSN: 1548-6192 |
| Publisher | MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1162/daed_a_01966 |
| OpenAlex | W4322576235 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
This essay responds to Natasha Iskander and Nichola Lowe's essay on the potential for biophilic institutions, lauding their focus on labor justice and the body of the worker as a route to institutional change. Using the U.S. military as an example, this response asks if all institutions can become biophilic or if some must instead be shrunk, dismantled, or radically reimagined? It goes on to consider the collateral impact of the military in terms of labor justice and environmental damage to call its biophilic potential into question
Biology · Collateral · Collateral damage · Criminology · Degrowth · Economic Justice · Environmental ethics · Environmental justice · Focus (optics · Political economy · Political science · Social justice · Sociology · Sustainability · Ecology · Employment and Welfare Studies · Law · Philosophy · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |