Deliberative Democracy in the Trenches
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9685189 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cass R Sunstein (0000-0003-4194-3008, The White House, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 146 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 129-139 |
| Publication date | 2017-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Daedalus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0011-5266 • E-ISSN: 1548-6192 |
| Publisher | MIT Press - Journals (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1162/daed_a_00452 |
| OpenAlex | W3122626778 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
In the last decades, many political theorists have explored the idea of deliberative democracy. The basic claim is that well-functioning democracies combine accountability with a commitment to reflection, information acquisition, multiple perspectives, and reason-giving. Does that claim illuminate actual practices? Much of the time, the executive branch of the United States has combined both democracy and deliberation, not least because it has placed a high premium on reason-giving and the acquisition of necessary information. It has also contained a high degree of internal diversity, encouraging debate and disagreement, not least through the public comment process. These claims are illustrated with concrete, if somewhat stylized, discussions of how the executive branch often operates
Accountability · Deliberation · Deliberative democracy · Democracy · Diversity (politics · Economics · Epistemology · Executive branch · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Process (computing · Sociology · Stylized fact · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy · Social Media and Politics
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.44 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2022 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |