Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Land for Food & Land for Nature

Bibliographic Data

ID9685326
AuthorsAndrew Balmford (0000-0002-0144-3589, Department of Conservation, corresponding author), Rhys Green (RHYS GREEN is Honorary Professor of Conservation Science in the Department of Zoology at the University of Cambridge and Principal Research Biologist at the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. He is the author of Birds and Climate Change: Impacts and Conservation Responses (with James W. Pearce-Higgins, 2014) and has contributed articles to such journals as Science, Nature, and Journal of Applied Ecology), Rhys E Green (0000-0001-8690-8914, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds), Ben Phalan (0000-0001-7876-7226, BEN PHALAN is the Zukerman Junior Research Fellow at King's College, Cambridge University. He has published articles in such journals as Science, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, and Food Policy.)
Year2015
Volume144
Issue4
Pages57-75
Publication date2015-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDaedalus (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0011-5266 • E-ISSN: 1548-6192
PublisherMIT Press - Journals (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1162/daed_a_00354
OpenAlexW1947619633
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited17

Opinions on how to limit the immense impact of agriculture on wild species are divided. Some think it best to retain as much wildlife as possible on farms, even at the cost of lowering yield (production per unit area). Others advocate the opposite: increasing yield so as to limit the area needed for farming, and then retaining larger areas under natural habitats. Still others support a mixture of the two extremes, or an intermediate approach. Here we summarize a model designed to resolve this disagreement, and review the empirical evidence available to date. We conclude that this evidence largely supports the second, so-called land-sparing approach to reconciling agriculture and biodiversity conservation, but that important questions remain over the generality of these findings for different biota and for ecosystem services, how best to increase yields while limiting environmental externalities, and whether there are effective, socially just, and practical mechanisms for coupling yield growth to habitat retention and restoration

Agriculture · Biodiversity · Biology · Economics · Ecosystem · Ecosystem services · Empirical evidence · Environmental resource management · Externality · Generality · Habitat · Limiting · Microeconomics · Natural resource · Natural resource economics · Unit (ring theory · Wildlife · Yield (engineering · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Ecology · Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies · Economic and Environmental Valuation

  • Ecosystem Service Provision by Secondary Forests in Shifting Cultivation Areas Remains Poorly Understood

    Open Access•Ole Mertz, Thilde Bech Bruun et al.•Human Ecology•2021

  • Spatially targeted nature-based solutions can mitigate climate change and nature loss but require a systems approach

    Open Access•Tom Finch, Richard B Bradbury et al.•One Earth•2023

  • Operationalizing transformative change for business in the context of Nature Positive

    Open Access•Hollie Booth, E J Milner-Gulland et al.•One Earth•2024

  • Beef–cattle ranching in the Paraguayan Chaco

    Open Access•María José Milán Sendra, E González•Environment Development and…•2023

  • The global cropland-sparing potential of high-yield farming

    Open Access•Christian Folberth, Nikolay Khabarov et al.•Nature Sustainability•2020

  • Limits to agricultural land for retaining acceptable levels of local biodiversity

    Open Access•Arkaitz Usubiaga‐Liaño, Georgina M Mace et al.•Nature Sustainability•2019

  • The environmental costs and benefits of high-yield farming

    Open Access•Andrew Balmford, Tetsuya Amano et al.•Nature Sustainability•2018

  • Safeguarding forests from smallholder oil palm expansion by more intensive production? The case of Ngwei forest (Cameroon)

    Open Access•Achille Jean Jaza Folefack, Marie Gaelle Ngo Njiki et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2019

  • Land Sparing and Land Sharing Policies in Developing Countries – Drivers and Linkages to Scientific Debates

    Open Access•Ole Mertz, Charlotte Filt Mertens•World Development•2017

  • Reconciling farming and wild nature

    Open Access•Silvio J Crespin, Javier A Simonetti•AMBIO•2019

  • Land Sparing Versus Land Sharing

    Open Access•Joern Fischer, David J Abson et al.•Conservation Letters•2014

  • Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming?

    Open Access•Joern Fischer, Berry J Brosi et al.•Frontiers in Ecology and the…•2008

  • Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s

    Open Access•Márcia N Macedo, Ruth Defries et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2012

  • Zoonosis emergence linked to agricultural intensification and environmental change

    Open Access•Bryony A Jones, Delia Grace et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2013

  • Do increases in agricultural yield spare land for nature?

    Open Access•Robert M Ewers, Jörn P W Scharlemann et al.•Global Change Biology•2009

  • Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature

    Open Access•Rhys E Green, Stephen J Cornell et al.•Science•2005

  • Agricultural sustainability

    Open Access•Jules Pretty•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2008

  • Reconciling Food Production and Biodiversity Conservation

    Open Access•Ben Phalan, Malvika Onial et al.•Science•2011

  • Food Security

    Open Access•H Charles J Godfray, John R Beddington et al.•Science•2010

  • Transportation costs and the spatial distribution of land use in the Brazilian Amazon

    Open Access•Diana Weinhold, Eustaquio J Reis et al.•Global Environmental Change•2007

  • Doubling food production to feed the 9 billion

    Open Access•Isobel Tomlinson•Journal of Rural Studies•2011

  • Minimising the harm to biodiversity of producing more food globally

    Open Access•Ben Phalan, Andrew Balmford et al.•Food Policy•2011

Unique citing works10
Citations per year1,11
Citation span2017 - 2024 (8)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae