Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evaluating the Revisionist Critique of Just War Theory

Bibliographic Data

ID9685426
AuthorsSeth Lazar (0000-0001-5378-6033, Polish Institute of International Affairs, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume146
Issue1
Pages113-124
Publication date2017-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDaedalus (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0011-5266 • E-ISSN: 1548-6192
PublisherMIT Press - Journals (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1162/daed_a_00426
OpenAlexW2570638673
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited8

Modern analytical just war theory starts with Michael Walzer's defense of key tenets of the laws of war in his Just and Unjust Wars. Walzer advocates noncombatant immunity, proportionality, and combatant equality: combatants in war must target only combatants; unintentional harms that they inflict on noncombatants must be proportionate to the military objective secured; and combatants who abide by these principles fight permissibly, regardless of their aims. In recent years, the revisionist school of just war theory, led by Jeff McMahan, has radically undermined Walzer's defense of these principles. This essay situates Walzer's and the revisionists’ arguments, before illustrating the disturbing vision of the morality of war that results from revisionist premises. It concludes by showing how broadly Walzerian conclusions can be defended using more reliable foundations

Combatant · Computer security · International law · Just war theory · Key (lock · Law and economics · Law of war · Morality · Political science · Proportionality (law · Sociology · Spanish Civil War · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · Torture, Ethics, and Law · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • A Contractualist Defense of Limited Moral Equality of Combatants

    Open Access•A Nguyen•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2026

  • To Face the World Alone or Together

    Open Access•Emily Wati Muir•Law Technology and Humans•2023

  • Crying Havoc and (Re)claiming Rights

    Open Access•Marcus Hedahl•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2023

  • A Zhuangzian perspective on the moral standing of combatants

    Luís Cordeiro-Rodrigues, Luís Cordeiro Rodrigues•Asian Philosophy•2026

  • The historical approach and the ‘war of ethics within the ethics of war’

    Open Access•Christian Nikolaus Braun•Journal of International…•2018

  • Just War and Unjust Soldiers

    Open Access•Scott D Sagan, Benjamin A Valentino•Ethics & International Affairs•2019

  • Revisiting Hiroshima in Iran

    Scott D Sagan, Benjamin A Valentino•International Security•2017

  • Just and Unjust Wars

    Michael Walzer•Just and Unjust Wars•1977

  • Innocence, Self‐Defense and Killing in War

    Open Access•Jeff Mcmahan•Journal of Political Philosophy•1994

  • Limiting the Killing in War

    Open Access•Janina Dill, Henry Shue•Ethics & International Affairs•2012

  • Desperate Times, Desperate Measures

    Alexander B Downes•International Security•2006

  • Actions, Intentions, and Consequences

    Warren Quinn, Warren S Quinn•The Philosophical Review•1989

  • Bear Any Burden? How Democracies Minimize the Costs of War

    Benjamin A Valentino, Paul K Huth et al.•The Journal of Politics•2010

Citations per year0.78
Citation span2017 - 2026 (10)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae