Philosophy & Its Classical Past
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9685443 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Phillip Mitsis (Hess (United States), corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 145 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 59-67 |
| Publication date | 2016-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Daedalus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0011-5266 • E-ISSN: 1548-6192 |
| Publisher | MIT Press - Journals (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1162/daed_a_00376 |
| OpenAlex | W2323599439 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
The notion that philosophers can abandon their history and set their arguments on new foundations has a long history. One strain of recent philosophy that traces its roots to Frege has been particularly confident in this regard, and its rejection of a classical past has had widespread influences on the study of ancient philosophy over the past several decades. With the waning of this recent paradigm, however, the possibility of philosophical engagement between the old and new has again led to significant work in several areas of philosophy. I concentrate on one of these, the philosophy of death, and also ask whether ancient philosophy might furnish models that enable contemporary philosophers to rise above their specialisms and address crucial issues in a public discourse, allowing for both mutual intelligibility and criticism
Criticism · Epistemology · History of philosophy · Intelligibility (philosophy · Philosophy of science · Political science · Western philosophy · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Historical Philosophy and Science · Law · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |