Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Risk & Responsibility

Social Science Research as a Modern “Anti-Politics Machine”

Bibliographic Data

ID9685481
AuthorsLisa Anderson (0000-0003-2574-5562)
Year2025
Volume154
Issue2
Pages243-262
Publication date2025-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDaedalus (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0011-5266 • E-ISSN: 1548-6192
PublisherMIT Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1162/daed_a_02150
OpenAlexW4410347167
LanguageEN
References cited17

This essay examines the distortions introduced into research agendas and research design by the effort to avoid seeming “political.” The rhetorical, institutional, and disciplinary operations of the social science research enterprise worldwide serve to divert attention from questions of power and collective accountability to a focus on technical interventions, institutional risk, and individual responsibility. These practices coincide with the specific circumstances of social science research in the Middle East and North Africa-where the exercise of political power in the form of international interference, irresponsible autocracy, civil disorder and violence, and protracted economic poverty and duress is difficult to conceal-to shape research terrains and agendas, and create a particularly, and tellingly, troubled research environment

Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social responsibility · Social science · Sociology · Law · Social Science and Policy Research

  • Not your grandfather's IMF

    Ilene Grabel•Cambridge Journal of Economics•2011

  • Global Social Sciences? Introducing a Series of Special Collections on the State and the Potential of the Social Sciences across the Globe

    Open Access•H K Anheier•Global Perspectives•2023

  • Reflections on the Study of Contentious Politics in the Middle East and North Africa

    Open Access•Rabab El‐mahdi•Global Perspectives•2024

  • Protecting” or “Policing”

    Open Access•Jihad Makhoul, Leila El-Alti et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2014

  • Knowledge without power

    Open Access•James D Long, Daniel Maliniak et al.•International Politics•2014

  • Against the ethicists

    M Hammersley•International Journal of Social…•2008

  • Can the anti-politics machine be dismantled

    Open Access•Rajesh Venugopal•New Political Economy•2022

  • Shifting Priorities or Business as Usual? Continuity and Change in the post-2011 IMF and World Bank Engagement with Tunisia, Morocco and Egypt

    Adam Hanieh•British Journal of Middle Eastern…•2014

  • Governing dual-use knowledge

    Open Access•Dagmar Rychnovská•Security Dialogue•2016

  • Reputational Risk, Academic Freedom and Research Ethics Review

    Open Access•Adam Hedgecoe•Sociology•2015

  • Researching Authoritarianism in the Discipline of Democracy

    Open Access•Ariel I Ahram, J P Goode•Social Science Quarterly•2016

  • The Imperialism of Categories

    Susanne Hoeber Rudolph•Perspectives on Politics•2005

  • The Politics and Governance of Non-Traditional Security1

    Open Access•Shahar Hameiri, Lee Jones•International Studies Quarterly•2013

  • Political Science Scholarship on the Middle East

    Open Access•Melani Cammett, Isabel Kendall•PS Political Science & Politics•2021

  • Anthropologists and Viceroys

    Open Access•C J Fuller•Modern Asian Studies•2016

  • One Soul at a Time

    Open Access•Samuel P Huntington•American Political Science Review•1988

  • Methodological nationalism and beyond

    Open Access•Andreas Wimmer, N Glick Schiller•Global Networks•2002

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae