Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The American Public's Energy Choice

Bibliographic Data

ID9685773
AuthorsStephen Ansolabehere (0000-0001-5240-9084, STEPHEN ANSOLABEHERE, a Fellow of the American Academy since 2007, is Professor of Government at Harvard University., corresponding author), David M Konisky (0000-0002-1146-3938, DAVID M. KONISKY is an Assistant Professor at the Georgetown Public Policy Institute.)
Year2012
Volume141
Issue2
Pages61-71
Publication date2012-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDaedalus (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0011-5266 • E-ISSN: 1548-6192
PublisherMIT Press - Journals (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1162/daed_a_00146
OpenAlexW2058479991
LanguageEN
Citations received8

Public opinion about energy can be understood in a unified framework. First, people evaluate key attributes of energy sources, particularly a fuel's cost and environmental harms. Americans, for example, view coal as relatively inexpensive but harmful, natural gas as less harmful but more expensive, and wind as inexpensive and not harmful. Second, people place different weights on the economic and environmental attributes associated with energy production, which helps explain why some fuels are more popular than others. Americans' attitudes toward energy are driven more by beliefs about environmental harms than by perceived economic costs. In addition, attitudes about energy sources are largely unrelated to views about global warming. These findings suggest that a politically palatable way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is through regulation of traditional pollutants associated with fossil fuels, rather than a wholly new carbon policy

Business · Climate change · Coal · Economics · Energy (signal processing · Energy policy · Energy source · Environmental economics · Fossil fuel · Global warming · Greenhouse gas · Natural gas · Natural resource economics · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Renewable energy · Waste management · Wind power · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Ecology · Engineering · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Law · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy

  • Politics, proximity and the pipeline

    Open Access•Timothy B Gravelle, Erick Lachapelle•Energy Policy•2015

  • Natural gas – friend or foe of the environment? Evaluating the framing contest over natural gas through a public opinion survey in the Pacific Northwest

    Shawn Hazboun, Hilary Boudet•Environmental Sociology•2021

  • Who participates in energy activism? Profiling political engagement in the United States

    Open Access•Trevor Memmott, Sanya Carley et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • The party politics of nuclear energy

    Open Access•Edwin Latré, Peter Thijssen et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • Using role play to explore energy perceptions in the United States and United Kingdom

    Open Access•Merryn Thomas, Tristan Partridge et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • Public views on renewable energy in the Rocky Mountain region of the United States

    Open Access•Shawn Hazboun, Richard S Krannich et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2016

  • Knowledge is power? Information, partisan cleavages, and support for energy infrastructure

    Open Access•Cory L Struthers, Min-Kyeong Cha et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2025

  • Energy Abundance or Environmental Worries? Analyzing Public Support for Fracking in the U nited S tates

    Open Access•Charles Davis, Jonathan M Fisk•Review of Policy Research•2014

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0.67
Citation span2014 - 2025 (12)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae