Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mill on Liberty of Self-Development

Bibliographic Data

ID9686279
AuthorsWendy Donner (University of Regina, corresponding author)
Year1987
Volume26
Issue2
Pages227-238
Publication date1987-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDialogue (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s001221730003818x
OpenAlexW2154190960
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited14

John Stuart Mill's commitment to liberty and individual development is one of the most exoteric themes of his moral and political philosophy. But the linkages between this commitment to liberty and development and Mill's conception of utility and principles of the good are not as commonly recognized. As part of a more general transformation of his utilitarianism, Mill repudiated Bentham's principles of the good and instead adopted a more sophisticated form of hedonism. While Bentham admits only the total quantity of pleasure as contributing to value, Mill expands the circle to admit quality or kind of pleasure as well into the value reckoning. I have elsewhere interpreted and defended Mill's qualitative hedonism, and in this paper I can offer only a brief overview of that account and must largely assume its plausibility. Bentham and Mill agree that only pleasurable experiences and the absence of painful experiences have value and so both are called hedonists. But they have very different views about what properties of pleasures makes them valuable, or in other words what are the good-making properties of pleasure. Bentham thinks that only intensity and duration, or quantity, are good-making properties of pleasures, and thus he includes only these properties in measuring value. As a consequence, in the context of value measurement he is not interested in the kinds of things in which people take pleasure. But Mill is a qualitative hedonist, and thinks that the quality or kind of pleasure is also a good-making characteristic and thus should be included in value measurement. The things that are sources of pleasure matter to Mill

Aesthetics · Context (archaeology) · Epistemology · Hedonism · Jeremy bentham · Mill · Pleasure · Pleasure principle · Political science · Sociology · Utilitarianism · Value (mathematics) · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence · Psychology

  • Feeling Utilitarian

    Open Access•Andrew Sneddon•Utilitas•2003

  • Democratic theory

    C B Macpherson•Democratic theory•1973

  • The life and times of liberal democracy

    C B Macpherson•The life and times of liberal…•1977

  • The Improvement of Mankind

    John Robson•Improvement of Mankind•1968

  • Mill on Liberty and Morality

    D G Brown•The Philosophical Review•1972

  • Educative Democracy

    A W Beck, Angela Beck et al.•British Journal of Educational…•1981

  • John Stuart Mill's Theory of Education

    John Wilson, F W Garforth•British Journal of Educational…•1980

  • John Stuart Mill's Concept of Utility

    Open Access•Wendy Donner•Dialogue•1983

  • Mill's Criterion of Wrong Conduct

    Open Access•D G Brown•Dialogue•1982

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,04
Citation span2003 - 2003 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae