Inequalities Not Conceded Yet
A Rejoinder to Gauthier's Reply
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9686441 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Braybrooke (Dalhousie University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1982 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 445-448 |
| Publication date | 1982-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217300021156 |
| OpenAlex | W2052111665 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
Gauthier's thinking about the social contract continues to develop vigorously. Had I aimed my criticisms at the stage of his thinking that he had reached at the time of his reply to them, rather than at earlier stages already in print, I would have organized my argument differently. Yet the earlier stages were interesting enough—and remain so—to deserve attention for their own sake. Moreover, my criticisms, even as they stand, have some effects that transcend those stages. They undermine the assumption that there is some uniquely attractive principle, whether Gauthier's principle of maximin relative advantage or any other, for determining what bargain is going to be struck on entering the social contract. They also, I persist in thinking, expose the difficulty of bringing home the maximum claims, as matters requiring respect, to agents who may lose out by accepting them as such matters
Argument (complex analysis) · Economics · Epistemology · Inequality · Law and economics · Positive economics · Sociology · Economic Theory and Institutions · Mathematics · Medicine · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |