Response to “Commentaire sur le texte de Sr Prudence Allen par Jocelyne St-Arnaud”
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9686745 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Prudence Allen (Concordia University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1987 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 277-280 |
| Publication date | 1987-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217300038221 |
| OpenAlex | W2125420406 |
| Language | FR |
I appreciate very much the thoroughness with which Jocelyne St-Arnaud has analyzed the text of my paper. As she points out, the major source of difference between our approach to the authors under consideration derives from a preference for an ethical and political perspective on her side and a preference for a metaphysical perspective on mine. However, there are a few key points in interpretation that need to be addressed which go beyond this central difference in orientation
Art · Epistemology · Humanities · Interpretation (philosophy) · Metaphysics · Perspective (graphical) · Political science · Politics · Preference · Prudence · Statistics · Health, Medicine and Society · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|